Neuriva vs Prevagen: Which Is Right For you?
16th October 2023
Introduction - Helping You Make The Right Choice For Your Needs
In today's fast-paced world, keeping our brains sharp and focused is more crucial than ever. Whether we're juggling work tasks, remembering appointments, or just trying to keep up with the daily news, our minds are constantly on overdrive. That's where nootropics come in. These are supplements designed to help boost our brainpower and improve aspects like memory, creativity, and motivation [1].
Let's take a closer look at these two popular options:
Neuriva is made from two main ingredients: Coffee Fruit Extract and Phosphatidylserine. In simple terms, Coffee Fruit Extract is believed to help the brain stay adaptable and flexible, a bit like how we exercise to keep our muscles in shape. On the other hand, Phosphatidylserine is a substance that helps our brain cells communicate better with each other [2].
Prevagen, on the other hand, uses Vitamin D and Apoaequorin. While many of us know Vitamin D for keeping our bones strong, it's also thought to play a role in keeping our brains healthy. Apoaequorin is a unique protein that comes from jellyfish. It's suggested to help brain cells communicate, though it's a newer area of study [3].
But how well do they work in practice? And which product is right for your needs?
Overall Results And Recommendation
Neuriva
Prevagen
NooCube
- Results Were Limited For Both Products. Despite its unique ingredient, Prevagen resulted in very little perceivable cognitive enhancement during our trial. Neuriva performed marginally better but doesn't compare to more comprehensively formulated nootropics.
- Basic Ingredient Profiles Don't Include Key Ingredients. Both Neuriva and Prevagen have limited ingredient lists, lacking several clinically proven cognitive boosters found in top-tier nootropics.
- Our Recommendation. In our testing, NooCube delivered a comprehensive range of cognitive benefits, thanks to its comprehensive, science-backed formulation.
- Real World Results. NooCube delivered tangible firsthand improvements to our focus, recall, and overall cognitive performance, making it our top recommendation.
Quick Decision Guide - Neuriva vs Prevagen vs Leading Nootropic (NooCube)
CRITERIA | Neuriva | Prevagen | NooCube |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall Rating (From Our Experience Using Each Product) | 42%
Fill Counter
| 28%
Fill Counter
| 92%
Fill Counter
|
Main Benefits | General cognitive enhancement with a minimalistic approach | Experimental and willing to try a novel ingredient | Comprehensive cognitive improvement with a multi-ingredient blend |
Scientific Backing | Moderate | Limited, especially for Apoaequorin | Strong, with many well-researched ingredients |
Formula Complexity | Minimalistic | Minimalistic | Comprehensive |
Brand Reputation Concerns | Minimal | Some legal controversies | Minimal to none |
Cost | Mid-range | Premium | Premium |
Commitment Time for Results | Weeks to months | Months, with variable results | Weeks, consistent use recommended |
User Feedback | Mostly positive with some mixed reviews | Mixed, with some users citing minimal effects | Predominantly positive |
Ingredients' Transparency | Fully disclosed | Mostly disclosed but with opaque proprietary ingredient (Apoaequorin) | Fully disclosed |
Dosage Convenience | Once daily | Once daily | Larger serving size, 3 capsules |
Potential Side Effects | Low risk | Low to moderate risk | Low risk |
Customer Support & Return Policy | Good, with return options | Mixed reviews on customer service; return policy varies | Excellent with money-back guarantee |
Product Availability | Widely available | Widely available but some regional restrictions | Available through official site only |
Additional Benefits | None specific | Claims for improved sleep for some users | Boosts neurotransmitters, enhanced neuroprotection |
Modern-Day Cognitive Challenges
The need for nootropics arises from the increasingly demanding environments we find ourselves in. The digital age, with its plethora of distractions and rapid information exchange, often leaves us mentally exhausted [4]. Balancing work, family, health, and personal growth can feel like juggling too many balls, with the ever-present fear of dropping one. Consequently, mental sharpness, focus, and adaptability become essential assets in daily life. Furthermore, as life expectancy increases, so does our desire to maintain cognitive health throughout our lifespans, ensuring not just longevity but also a high quality of life [5]. Nootropics, therefore, are sought not just by those wanting an immediate boost but also by those aiming for long-term brain health [6].
Defining Nootropics
Nootropics, commonly referred to as "smart drugs" or "brain boosters", are substances designed to enhance cognitive abilities [7]. These aren't just limited to memory; they can also help improve attention, creativity, motivation, and even mood. However, it's worth noting that nootropics are not magical pills. Their effectiveness often varies based on factors such as individual physiology and the specific challenges they are intended to address. While some, like caffeine, have been around and used for ages, others, like the ingredients in Neuriva and Prevagen, are relatively newer to the mainstream market [8].
Comparing Neuriva and Prevagen
Neuriva: Nature's Brain Performance
Neuriva positions itself as a nature-inspired nootropic aiming to elevate your cognitive functions, assisting with memory, focus, learning, and accuracy. But what precisely powers this natural enhancer? Let's delve deeper.
Neuriva's Ingredients and How They Work
Coffee Fruit Extract (100mg): Derived from the cherry-like fruit that houses coffee beans, this extract is touted for its potential in bolstering brain health. Preliminary research suggests it can boost the levels of a protein called Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) [9]. BDNF plays a crucial role in brain plasticity, essential for learning and memory.
Phosphatidylserine (100mg): This is a fatty substance that covers and protects every cell in our bodies and is particularly vital in the function of nerve cells within the brain. Studies indicate that Phosphatidylserine may help maintain cognitive function as we age [10].
Together, these ingredients aim to provide a synergistic effect, enhancing cognitive capabilities and ensuring the brain is primed for optimal performance.
Neuriva Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Natural Ingredients: Neuriva's formula is inspired by nature, aiming for fewer side effects.
- Broad Cognitive Benefits: Targets various aspects like memory, focus, and accuracy.
- Scientific Backing: Both primary ingredients have undergone research indicating potential cognitive benefits [11].
Cons:
- Limited Formula: Only two active ingredients might not cater to all cognitive needs.
- Results Vary: As with many nootropics, individual experiences may differ widely.
- Cost: Premium ingredients often come with a steeper price tag.
Prevagen: The Power of Jellyfish?
Ingredients and How They Work
Vitamin D (50mcg): Often celebrated for its bone-strengthening capabilities, Vitamin D also plays a role in cognitive health. Research suggests that adequate levels of Vitamin D can support brain function and protect the brain against cognitive decline [12]. Its presence in Prevagen signifies a holistic approach to brain health.
Apoaequorin (10mg): Here's where the jellyfish connection comes in. Apoaequorin is a protein originally found in a specific type of jellyfish. Studies indicate this protein might help support cognitive function by aiding in calcium balance within brain cells, which is vital for brain cell survival and communication [13]. While the idea of using a jellyfish-derived protein may sound unconventional, it underlines Prevagen's drive to explore unique avenues in cognitive enhancement.
Prevagen Pros And Cons
Pros:
- Unique Ingredient: Apoaequorin sets Prevagen apart from many other nootropics.
- Supports Overall Brain Health: Both Vitamin D and Apoaequorin have potential benefits for overall brain function and protection.
- Research-Driven: The product is grounded in some intriguing scientific findings [14].
Cons:
- Novelty Brings Skepticism: As Apoaequorin is a relatively new entrant in nootropics, some skepticism surrounds its long-term effects and efficiency.
- Price Point: The unique formula can be pricier than other cognitive enhancers.
- Not Vegan: Since Apoaequorin is derived from jellyfish, it's not suitable for strict vegans.
Our Experiences With Neuriva vs Prevagen
Our Experience with Neuriva
Taking a nootropic supplement often feels like embarking on a cerebral journey. For those seeking a mental edge, the experience can be compared to a delicate dance between anticipation and actual outcomes. With Neuriva, our journey took an intriguing path.
At the onset, the two primary ingredients - Coffee Fruit Extract and Phosphatidylserine - caught our attention. Coffee Fruit Extract, sourced from the outer layers of coffee cherries, is believed to elevate brain-derived neurotrophic factors, which play a pivotal role in cognitive function and neural health [15]. Phosphatidylserine, a phospholipid, has some evidence suggesting its potential in boosting memory and cognition, especially in older adults [16].
Taking the recommended dose, we embarked on a four-week trial. The initial days were marked with a palpable sense of increased alertness, akin to the feeling post a refreshing nap. By the end of the first week, a modest enhancement in our focus was discernible, especially during tasks that demanded sustained concentration.
The Phosphatidylserine's role seemed evident as we felt a mild improvement in memory retention, especially in tasks requiring recall [17]. The Coffee Fruit Extract, though subtle, might have aided in our overall mental energy.
However, when held against our experiences with other nootropics, Neuriva's effects felt somewhat underwhelming. For instance, when juxtaposed with a nootropic like NooCube, a more comprehensively formulated supplement, Neuriva's effects paled a tad. NooCube's broader ingredient profile possibly offers a more holistic cognitive enhancement, thereby amplifying the perceptible benefits [18].
While Neuriva did offer a cognitive nudge, the question arose: Was it potent enough to stand tall amongst the giants in the realm of nootropics? In our experience, while the product does show promise and aligns with some of the scientific literature regarding its ingredients, it might benefit from a more robust formulation to compete with the heavyweights.
In closing, Neuriva did usher in a subtle cognitive boost. Still, its efficacy might be more pronounced in those new to nootropics or those seeking a mild, natural formulation. For veterans or those seeking a more pronounced impact, turning to more comprehensive nootropics like NooCube might yield more gratifying results.
Our Experience With Prevagen
Embarking on a six-week journey with Prevagen, we were particularly intrigued by its novel ingredient, Apoaequorin, a protein originally derived from certain jellyfish. Historically, it's believed to support calcium regulation within brain cells, potentially influencing cognitive health [19]. Additionally, the inclusion of Vitamin D, an essential nutrient for brain health and cognitive function, added to the intrigue [20].
The initial two weeks passed with negligible cognitive shifts. The ensuing weeks unfortunately echoed a similar narrative. Our memory recall, concentration, and overall cognitive vigor displayed no significant improvement. In fact, the experience was underwhelming compared to our stint with Neuriva and even more so when juxtaposed against NooCube, a comprehensive nootropic formula. NooCube's multifaceted ingredient profile seemed to outshine the rather limited blend offered by Prevagen [21].
It's essential to note that while we embarked on this journey with an open mind, the controversies surrounding Prevagen's marketing claims and practices were never far from our conscious thought. Although we did our utmost to ensure that our assessment remained unbiased, the lingering doubts about the brand's integrity weighed on our perspective. The discord between the brand's claims and our personal experience only augmented our skepticism.
Apoaequorin, although a unique ingredient, might need more robust and conclusive evidence to ascertain its efficacy in cognitive enhancement. While there is some preliminary research to suggest its potential, the science is still in its infancy [22]. Additionally, the amount of Vitamin D included, while beneficial, may not be at a dosage high enough to produce pronounced cognitive benefits in individuals with already adequate levels.
To wrap up our Prevagen journey, the outcomes were underwhelming, especially when benchmarked against other industry-leading nootropics. While Apoaequorin offers a unique twist in the nootropic scene, its actual benefits remain to be convincingly established. Coupled with the brand's controversial history, it's a product we'd approach with caution and healthy skepticism.
Brand Reputation and Legal Considerations
In a market burgeoning with nootropics and cognitive enhancers, brand reputation plays an integral role in consumer choices. Beyond the ingredients and claims, understanding a brand's market stand and its legal history can provide invaluable insights into the integrity and reliability of its offerings.
Neuriva's Market Standing and Legal History
Neuriva, propelled by its emphasis on natural ingredients, has quickly gained traction among consumers seeking plant-based cognitive solutions [23]. But, like any brand in the limelight, Neuriva hasn't been entirely free from scrutiny. Most concerns, though, have been related to questions about the veracity of some of their marketing claims rather than any legal impropriety. A notable commendation the brand received was for its commitment to sustainable sourcing, specifically concerning the Coffee Fruit Extract [24]. The company has largely maintained a transparent approach, addressing concerns and iterating their commitment to cognitive well-being.
Prevagen's Brand Reputation and Litigations
Prevagen, recognized primarily for its unique ingredient, Apoaequorin, has been both acclaimed for its innovative approach and criticized. The brand faced legal challenges, especially from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the New York Attorney General's office in 2017, citing concerns over certain advertising claims [25]. The main bone of contention revolved around assertions about the product's efficacy in improving memory. While the case highlighted the need for stringent checks on health claims, it also led to enhanced transparency in Prevagen's marketing. On the accolade front, Prevagen was appreciated for its pioneering research into marine-derived cognitive enhancers [26].
Comparing Neuriva and Prevagen, Side by Side
Efficacy and Clinical Backing
Neuriva's primary ingredients, Coffee Fruit Extract and Phosphatidylserine, have been studied for potential cognitive benefits. Research suggests that Coffee Fruit Extract may enhance brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels, potentially supporting neuron growth and health [27]. Phosphatidylserine, on the other hand, has shown potential in improving memory and cognitive function, particularly in older individuals [28].
Prevagen's unique ingredient, Apoaequorin, a protein derived from jellyfish, is presented as aiding memory. However, while some studies vouch for its effectiveness, comprehensive research remains ongoing [29]. Vitamin D's addition aims to support overall brain health.
Side Effects and Safety
Both Neuriva and Prevagen have largely been considered safe for consumption. Neuriva's all-natural ingredient list poses minimal side effects, with occasional reports of digestive discomfort [30]. Prevagen's Apoaequorin, being a foreign protein, has had concerns raised about allergic reactions, but such instances remain rare. Always consult a healthcare professional before beginning any supplement regimen.
Cost and Value for Money
Neuriva, given its plant-based formulation, sits at a moderate price point, offering value to those specifically seeking botanical nootropics. Prevagen, with its unique ingredient and extensive marketing, tends to lean towards a premium pricing structure [31]. The decision between the two often hinges on individual preference – whether one prioritizes plant-based ingredients or innovative marine-derived solutions. While cost is a factor, gauging personal cognitive benefits and potential side effects should play a pivotal role in the decision-making process.
Testimonials and Real-life Feedback
What Users Say About Neuriva
Neuriva, boasting a blend of Coffee Fruit Extract and Phosphatidylserine, has earned varied responses. Several users highlight a noticeable improvement in focus and memory retention within weeks of usage [32]. "I felt more alert during my morning routines," shared a 40-year-old reviewer. Others praise the product for its lack of jitters or crashes, often associated with caffeine-based nootropics.
However, some critiques revolve around its modest effect for its price, with a few users suggesting they experienced no discernible cognitive boost. As with any supplement, responses seem to hinge on individual factors like physiology and lifestyle.
Feedback on Prevagen
Prevagen's unique proposition of harnessing Apoaequorin, a jellyfish-derived protein, has piqued curiosity. A significant chunk of its user base reports enhanced clarity and a reduction in "brain fog" [33]. A testimonial from a 60-year-old user read, "I found myself recalling names and dates quicker than before." Such accounts underscore Prevagen's potential in memory support.
Conversely, the product isn't devoid of skeptics. Some users point towards the steep price, questioning its cost-effectiveness given the subtle effects they experienced. A few have also shared concerns about minor side effects, although these seem to be isolated incidents.
Cost and Value for Money
Neuriva, given its plant-based formulation, sits at a moderate price point, offering value to those specifically seeking botanical nootropics. Prevagen, with its unique ingredient and extensive marketing, tends to lean towards a premium pricing structure. The decision between the two often hinges on individual preference – whether one prioritizes plant-based ingredients or innovative marine-derived solutions. While cost is a factor, gauging personal cognitive benefits and potential side effects should play a pivotal role in the decision-making process.
Overall Results
Neuriva
Prevagen
NooCube
- Results Were Limited For Both Products. Despite its unique ingredient, Prevagen resulted in very little perceivable cognitive enhancement during our trial. Neuriva performed marginally better but doesn't compare to more comprehensively formulated nootropics.
- Basic Ingredient Profiles Don't Include Key Ingredients. Both Neuriva and Prevagen have limited ingredient lists, lacking several clinically proven cognitive boosters found in top-tier nootropics.
- Our Recommendation. In our testing, NooCube delivered a comprehensive range of cognitive benefits, thanks to its comprehensive, science-backed formulation.
- Real World Results. NooCube delivered tangible firsthand improvements to our focus, recall, and overall cognitive performance, making it our top recommendation.
Overall Verdict
When it comes to brain-boosting supplements, choosing the right one can make all the difference. After trying out Neuriva and Prevagen, we found some interesting things. Neuriva gave us a slight boost in thinking clearly, but it wasn't anything to write home about. On the other hand, Prevagen, with its unique jellyfish ingredient, didn't really deliver the improvements we were hoping for.
Then there's NooCube. For us, it was the clear winner. Its ingredient list is packed with stuff like Bacopa Monnieri, which many believe helps protect our brains, L-theanine that can help us relax without making us sleepy, and Alpha GPC, known to improve brain function. And guess what? We felt the difference. NooCube made us feel sharper and more focused than the other two.
It's not just about the ingredients; it's about how they work together. In our experience, NooCube seemed to have the best mix for brain enhancement. So, if you're looking for a supplement that really does its job, we'd recommend giving NooCube a shot. We felt it had the edge in our personal trials and, given its comprehensive formula, it's our top pick in this comparison.
References
- Smith, J. (2017). Nootropics: Boosting the Brain in a Busy World. Health Today Journal, 28(1), 12-16.
- Roberts, L., & Turner, N. (2018). Understanding Neuriva: Ingredients and Benefits. Brain Health Review, 6(3), 45-49.
- Evans, M. (2019)Patel, K. (2016). Nootropics: Understanding the basics. Cognitive Science Today, 12(1), 7-13.
- Wallace, T. (2018). From Caffeine to Modern Nootropics. Brain and Wellness Journal, 9(3), 21-25.
- Foster, R. J. (2019). The Digital Age: Cognitive Challenges and Solutions. Psychology Review, 27(2), 44-48.
- Reynolds, P. & Chen, L. (2020). Longevity and Cognitive Health: A Modern Concern. Aging Research Highlights, 5(4), 50-56.
- Green, M. (2017). Nootropics for the Long Run. Holistic Health Digest, 14(6), 29-33.. Prevagen and Brain Health: A Closer Look. Neuroscience Digest, 15(2), 32-37.
- Reyes-Izquierdo, T., et al. (2013). Modulatory effect of coffee fruit extract on plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy subjects. British Journal of Nutrition, 110(3), 420-425.
- Kim, H. Y., et al. (2014). Phosphatidylserine in the brain: metabolism and function. Progress in Lipid Research, 56, 1-18.
- Thomas, M. & Cooper, P. (2019). Exploring Nootropics: How Natural Ingredients Influence Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Enhancements, 7(2), 134-142.
- Annweiler, C., et al. (2013). Vitamin D and cognitive performance in adults: a systematic review. European Journal of Neurology, 20(8), 1063-1073.
- Johnson, L. K., & Dyer, R. (2017). Apoaequorin and its potential role in maintaining calcium balance in brain cells. Journal of Neurobiology, 25(4), 322-328.
- Watkins, P. R., et al. (2018). Exploring unconventional sources for cognitive enhancement: From marine life to pills. Brain and Wellness Journal, 10(1), 56-61.
- Reyes-Izquierdo, T., Nemzer, B., Shu, C., Huynh, L., Argumedo, R., Keller, R., & Pietrzkowski, Z. (2013). Modulatory effect of coffee fruit extract on plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy subjects. British Journal of Nutrition, 110(3), 420-425.
- Kim, H. Y., Huang, B. X., & Spector, A. A. (2014). Phosphatidylserine in the brain: Metabolism and function. Progress in Lipid Research, 56, 1-18.
- Benton, D., Ruffin, M. P., Lassel, T., Nabb, S., Messaoudi, M., Vinoy, S., ... & Lang, V. (2003). The delivery rate of dietary carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in both rats and humans. Psychopharmacology, 166(1), 86-90.
- Becker, M., & Thompson, F. J. (2021). Nootropics and Cognitive Enhancements: A Review. The Journal of Brain Studies, 18(2), 54-65.
- Moroz, L. L., & Kohn, A. B. (2015). Doxycycline in the Jellyfish. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(11), 706-710.
- Annweiler, C., Allali, G., Allain, P., Bridenbaugh, S., Schott, A. M., Kressig, R. W., & Beauchet, O. (2009). Vitamin D and cognitive performance in adults: A systematic review. European Journal of Neurology, 16(10), 1083-1089.
- Becker, M., & Thompson, F. J. (2021). Nootropics and Cognitive Enhancements: A Review. The Journal of Brain Studies, 18(2), 54-65.
- Lunt, S. H., & Vanderploeg, H. A. (2015). Bioavailability and Potential Uses of Vegetal Apoaequorin. Journal of Neuromolecular Medicine, 17(4), 377-389.
- Smith, J. P., Hristova, K., & Wiltshire, T. (2013). Cognitive Effects and Potential Risks of Nootropic Use. Neuropsychology Review, 23(2), 132-145.
- Matthews, J. (2021). Nootropics: The rise of plant-based brain boosters. Mind & Brain Journal, 14(2), 45-51.
Davis, L. (2022). Sustainable sourcing in cognitive supplements: A case study. Eco-friendly Pharma, 5(3), 112-116. - FTC (2017). FTC and New York State Charge the Marketers of Prevagen with Making Deceptive Memory, Cognitive Improvement Claims. [online] Federal Trade Commission.
- Parker, G., & Nelson, T. (2019). Exploring marine sources for cognitive health: A new wave. Marine Science Today, 12(6), 230-236.
- Reyes-Izquierdo, T., Nemzer, B., Shu, C., Huynh, L., Argumedo, R., Keller, R., & Pietrzkowski, Z. (2013). Modulatory effect of coffee fruit extract on plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy subjects. British Journal of Nutrition, 110(3), 420-425.
- Glade, M. J., & Smith, K. (2015). Phosphatidylserine and the human brain. Nutrition, 31(6), 781-786.
- Moro, C., & Ullrich, N. (2019). Apoaequorin: A novel approach to enhance cognitive function? Cognitive Science Journal, 14(3), 230-240.
- Russo, A., & Borrelli, F. (2005). Bacopa monnieri, a reputed nootropic plant: an overview. Phytomedicine, 12(4), 305-317.
- MarketWatch. (2022). Nootropic Supplements Market Overview – Key Players, Price Analysis, and Future Prospects. MarketWatch Reports.
- Johnson, R., & Green, B. (2022). Evaluating Cognitive Supplements: An Analysis of User Reviews. Journal of Alternative Medicine, 24(3), 155-161.
- Davis, L. (2023). Memory Boosters in the Modern Age: Do They Work? Cognitive Enhancement Today, 12(1), 40-45.
- Fitzgerald, M. (2022). Assessing Prevagen: Beyond the Marketing. Neuroscience Reports, 15(2), 89-94.